|
Boost : |
From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-25 09:43:05
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:32:29 -0300, Fernando Cacciola
<fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> none would have internal linkage according to 7.1.5.1/2. So it wouldn't
>> violate the ODR. But a pointer to none from one translation unit would
>> differ from a pointer to none from a different TU.
>>
>Does this difference matter?
My opinion is that if it doesn't matter for Boost.Optional then it
doesn't matter. I see none and none_t as Optional's implementation
details which unfortunately went into the root directory.
-- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk