Re: [boost] is_nan

From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-25 16:32:58

John Maddock wrote:

> Oh, actually I need generic versions of these functions in order to
> make parts of the math toolkit I'm working on generic: at the very
> least these scale to pretty much anything that has numeric_limits
> defined, without that all you can do is assume the number is a zero
> or a normal: but that's OK too because most (all?) extended precision
> types like NTL::RR don't support infinities or NaN's anyway.

Sounds like another good test candidate for C++0x Concepts ;?)

-- 
AlisdairM