From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-26 09:16:15
Johan Råde wrote:
> Joe Gottman wrote:
>> Several libraries have an is_nan() function buried deep in the code. Are
>> there any plans to make a general is_nan function available? This would be
>> quite useful, as well as similar functions like is_finite.
>> Joe Gottman
>> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> The date_time library contains the following is_nan function:
> static bool is_nan(const T& x)
> return std::numeric_limits<T>::has_quiet_NaN && (x != x);
> It has been pointed out by Martin Bonner that this is not safe,
> for it requires strict IEEE 754 compliance and it may be optimized away
> by an over-eager optimizing compiler.
FYI, this is basically unused code in that date_time int_adapter (note name)
is only ever used with integer types internally. This really should be
removed to avoid confusion...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk