From: Bjørn Roald (bjorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-27 12:01:08
Albert Chin skrev:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:11:21AM +0400, Simon Atanasyan wrote:
>> Albert Chin wrote:
>>> Is stlport4 "better" than Cstd?
>> Cstd is an old implementation. It does not conforms to standard.
>> And it will never conforms because we (Sun) need to maintains
>> binary compatibility with old releases. Stlport is closer to
>> standard and contains some features necessary for Boost.
> Doesn't using stlport4 require an installation of the Sun C++ compiler
> installed for access to libstlport.so?
-library=stlport4 tell the Sun C++ (pre)compiler and linker to use the stlport lib that ship and installs with the standard install, but it is not used as default. Hope that answers your question.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk