Re: [boost] Boost regression testing status

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-27 14:29:18

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:48:12 +0100, "John Maddock"
<john_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>Gennaro Prota wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to point your attention toward the current status of our
>> regression testing. I'll not express opinions, but these are some
>> facts about 1.34:
>
>> The list is not exhaustive.
>
>Nope, my pet hate at present is http://tinyurl.com/jqe7j where the results 
>from one test (an expected failure, marked up) are being listed under a 
>completely different test :-(

Argh :-(

John, while you are here, I saw that you didn't reply about
identifying min/max guideline violations in comments being difficult
via regexes. That made me think twice, as I supposed it was pretty
easy to do with sub_matches or alternation. The basis seems to be
"//.*$" for single-line comments and "/\*.*?\*/" for multi-line ones.
What am I missing? :-)

--
[ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]