|
Boost : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-31 15:11:58
Gennaro Prota writes:
> About the regression test mess, dynamic_bitset is not listed in the
> report, but has some "red" failures
A "red" failure indicates a regression from the last-known-good
release, whether the toolset is marked as required or not, so it's
perfectly normal to have these present on the library's page and
absent from the Issues page.
> on compilers which I don't think were tested before (which I've
> discovered by chance);
Which compilers, and why do you think they weren't tested before?
> and cases where the same compiler passes or not depending on the
> test runner (e.g. VC7).
That happens, and when it does, it needs investigation.
> Honestly, even if all this has an explanation, are such tests
> useful?
Well, what is your definition of "such tests"?
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk