From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-31 21:42:06
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:19:45 -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy
>Surely there is a lot of room for improvement (as illustrated by
>but the above sounds like you think they are in flux, and if so, you
>should list the particular issues that led you to this conclusion, or
>otherwise it's FUD. For instance, surely you could check 1.33.1 report
>pages before making the claim that dynamic_bitset wasn't tested with
>CW 8.3 (or any other toolset)?
Yes. The "particular issues which led me to this conclusion" are
listed in the initial post of this thread. Surely you could read a
little above before making the claim that anyone spreads FUD,
especially when it comes to people who is being here for years.
That said, I don't think I've much more to add to this thread.
-- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk