From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-17 10:45:16
Paul Bristow wrote
> That is indeed the *intention* - but entirely USER-DEFINED and with NO MATH
> NaNs are never > < or == anyway?
But it tells you where how you got there doesnt it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk