From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-29 16:17:44
Deane Yang wrote:
> Andy Little wrote:
>>> Ben appears to have implemented a core library that I believe has a much
>>> broader range of applications than a physical dimensions library. I have
>>> reason to believe that somewhere inside your library, you have the same
>>> thing implemented.
>> That is not now or for the foreeable future a goal of Quan.
> This sounds reasonable to me. It appears to me that there are two
> distinct libraries with two distinct sets of applications that we've all
> been discussing as if they were the same thing. I think Ben, Jeff, and I
> want the "no pre-defined dimensions" one, while yours is a physical
> dimensions library.
I agree...seems like there's room for both. User defined units is a long and
old debate. Some of us aren't going to give up on it :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk