From: Jeremy Day (jeremy.day_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-01 08:12:21
On 9/1/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It's not really the same as making point actually *be* a conforming
> fusion sequence, in some sense, is it? You've sorta "cheated" by
> giving it a kind of implicitly-recognized conversion into a view.
Don't you need the functionality that Joel describes if you deal with code
from a library that you didn't write, such as anything provided by
Microsoft? Or if you are dealing with legacy code?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk