Boost logo

Boost :

From: loufoque (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-12 08:30:49

Alexander Nasonov wrote :

> Now think of a programmer who believes that they code is safe because
> it throws on overflow but the code isn't safe because it contains subtle
> bugs that appear only after the exception is thrown (e. g. broken
> invariants).
> What do you prefer to look for in a code, for missing checks or for
> invariants?

Good code should be exception-safe anyway.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at