Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification (2006-09-13/RC_1_34_0) *X*

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-14 14:41:28

Peter Dimov wrote:

> But my question wasn't about ODR violations or egos. I asked what is the 
> proper course of action for a library developer whose library has been 
> flagged by the report. And it seems that nobody knows. I can remove the 
> unnamed namespace (at some cost) but this is a potentially destabilizing 
> change and not suited for 1.34, against which the report is being run. 

And at this point the only concern should be regressions anyway, right ?

Regards,
                Stefan