From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-14 14:41:28
Peter Dimov wrote:
> But my question wasn't about ODR violations or egos. I asked what is the
> proper course of action for a library developer whose library has been
> flagged by the report. And it seems that nobody knows. I can remove the
> unnamed namespace (at some cost) but this is a potentially destabilizing
> change and not suited for 1.34, against which the report is being run.
And at this point the only concern should be regressions anyway, right ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk