From: Aristid Breitkreuz (aribrei_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-16 21:08:05
Am Samstag, den 16.09.2006, 19:55 +0200 schrieb loufoque:
> Aristid Breitkreuz wrote :
> > That's fine. Do you have plans on which Unicode encoding to use
> > internally?
> UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32 would all be available for implementations, and
> each one would be able to take or give the other ones for input/output.
I guess that every single supported type is extra complexity, right?
Would not UTF-8 (for brevity and compatibility) and UTF-32 (because it
might be better for some algorithms) suffice?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk