|
Boost : |
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-18 20:07:41
Robert Ramey wrote:
> But now I see
> that was a mistake. We only have two types of XML archives and they
> could have been handled by putting the NVP handling in the most
> derived class - even though it was some repetition. oh well.
Replace the above with
But now I see that was a mistake. We only have two types of XML archives
and they
could have been handled by makeing two specializations of
void nvp<T>::serialize(xml_oarchive &ar, ...
and
void nvp<T>::serialize(xmo_woarchive &ar, ..
which is what propse that array do.
Robert Ramey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk