From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-21 08:49:30
David Abrahams wrote:
> Wouldn't extension be a lot easier if iterator_base and sequence_base
> took (optional) 2nd arguments that specify the tag? Then you wouldn't
> need that whole dance that enables tag dispatching (right?)
Good point. There will be more revisions to the extension aspect of
Fusion. I too am not quite happy with it -- it's still quite tedious
to write your own fully conforming sequences. Thanks for the suggestion.
I added this in my notebook.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk