Re: [boost] [fusion] Easier extension

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-21 08:49:30

David Abrahams wrote:
> Wouldn't extension be a lot easier if iterator_base and sequence_base
> took (optional) 2nd arguments that specify the tag?  Then you wouldn't
> need that whole dance that enables tag dispatching (right?)
> 
> http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/fusion/doc/html/fusion/extension.html#fusion.extension.designing_a_suitable_iterator

Good point. There will be more revisions to the extension aspect of
Fusion. I too am not quite happy with it -- it's still quite tedious
to write your own fully conforming sequences. Thanks for the suggestion.
I added this in my notebook.

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net