From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-21 12:10:15
David Abrahams wrote:
> The problem we're having is that what
> you're complaining about is a situation created, and of whose merit
> many of us were convinced, by you.
The problem we're having is that there is a disagreement
about how to design such an extension in such a way
that it isn't a future maintainence headache. Of course,
if I make an observation that conflicts with some
currently (perhaps widely) held opinion I suppose that one can say
I "created a situation". LOL - but in my view the "situation"
is already created - I'm just stating what to me is obvious.
A perfect example of this is the boost test/release system.
When I first made obvervations on this topic they were roundly
dismissed (that's OK) and it was sort of suggested that I was
just being contrary for its own sake. (not really OK - but
I can just ignore it). I think that the current situation and ideas
floating around on this subject make it clear that my original ideas on the
subject had some merit after all - and that this is coming to be
I can't help wonder how many worthy ideas are NOT posted because
the poster is reluctant to subject himself to this kind of characterization.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk