From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-21 13:32:58
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Paul A Bristow
> But IF IT HAD, it MIGHT provide 'prior art' to defend against
> the patent,
> for Boost is undoubtedly published in the public domain and
> available for
> everyone to see.
> I hope that Boost will, in future, prevent (or at least
> deter) some of the
> silly software patents that are doing little but enrich some
> members of the
> legal progression.
Apparently, if prior art is discussed during application of the patent,
it is seldom used in invalidating the patent.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk