Re: [boost] Boost.MPI accepted

From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-22 11:23:35

On 9/22/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> [snipped]

> Using Boost.Parameter is not the same sort of thing; it comes with
> Boost and is transparent to build/configuration issues.  I'm not
> saying what you're suggesting is a bad idea; I just don't see what
> great advantage it offers.

Faster compile time?
Boost.Parameter uses a great deal of metaprogramming, and I used a
little here in a project of mine. It really makes the interface
better, but the compile times grow a lot. IMO, they are worth, but I
doubt everybody would agree.

>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> www.boost-consulting.com

-- 
Felipe Magno de Almeida