From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-23 05:34:52
"Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Andy Little wrote:
>> "Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> Andy Little wrote:
>>>> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>>>> AFAICT the name ftag should be changed to something more descriptive
>>>>> and more certainly unique, e.g. boost_fusion_iterator_tag. Is there
>>>>> a reason it needs to be so short?
>>>> Why make such a trivial change to the interface post review? AFAICS now
>>>> late, and will cause unnecessary pain to users.. like myself.
>>> Well, actually, it shouldn't be a part of the interface.
>>> Here, I'm used to calling it the f#%$tag :) It's not supposed
>>> to be for public consumption, and I intend to enforce that.
>>> Either way, it's not a good name (especially for minors. ;)
>>> and it must be changed.
>> And BTW its pretty public in the 'make your own iterator" part of the docs.
> Yeah. That's unfortunate. I asked Dan to fix it. Anyway, I suggest you
> do the right thing: specialize tag_of.
OK. Maybe I oughtta move my iterators out of namespace fusion too :-). Anyway
its only quick test code at the moment.
>> So far I have made 5 fusion style iterators. Next is the matrix minor
>> which extracts minors from a matrix, as a prelude to extracting cofactors.
BTW 'Minors' is section 2.7.1 in my "Quaternions and Rotation Sequences, A
Primer with Applications to Orbits, Aerospace and Virtual Reality." by Jack B.
IOW that is where I am up to in the book so far!
Question is... will I get to the end of the book or the end of compiler
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk