From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-23 16:08:39
Jeff Garland <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I, for one, am happy they have made the effort to provide a common way to do
> this in C++. It's even more amazing to me that their's virtually no loss of
Not virtually. According to the best measurements we have, there's
just plain no loss of efficiency. If you believe the numbers, there
might even be an efficiency gain.
> It's only thru this sort of experimentation and effort that
> programming practices can be improved. I'd eventually like to see a
> language feature, but that's a different discussion....
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk