From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-27 14:46:32
"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Variadics is a separate feature from what ConceptGCC provides. I know
>> variadics are generating a lot of well-earned excitement, but think
>> ConceptGCC really deserves more attention.
> Sure, but I for one have some trepidation about applying Concepts to
> everything. The main issue that worries me is that checking everything is going
> to be very slow.
You seem to have that concern often, and often prematurely.
> And I am not sure I totally agree.
If you're disagreeing, I think it's because I wasn't clear. I meant
that "ConceptGCC really deserves more attention than it is currently
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk