Boost logo

Boost :

From: Shams (shams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-06 07:36:05

Hi Marcin,

We are eargerly waiting, please post to this list when it is in CVS.

It is becoming a tiring task to collect "proposed" boost libraries
for usage when not in the main cvs.

1. What is the status on reading/writing environment variables?

2. Have you planned any support for writing command line arguments
as a string?

What I mean is that if a process wants to spawn another "written in-house"
process eg. something that uses boost.program_options to parse the command
could they use the property_tree library to generate such command line as
an string?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcin Kalicinski" <kalita_at_[hidden]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: property tree library not in CVS?

> Hi Jeff,
>> As I've done in the past, I'll really encourage you *not* wait to finish
>> the
>> docs to put the code in CVS. To help us avoid a repeat of 1.34 we need
>> libraries going into 1.35 to be in CVS and regression tested as early in
>> the
>> cycle as possible. [...]
> I agree it might be beneficial to put the library in the CVS, even though
> the docs are not up to date yet. But I don't yet have access to the main
> CVS, so how should we handle that?
> Thank you,
> Marcin
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at