Re: [boost] property tree library not in CVS?

From: Shams (shams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-06 07:36:05

Hi Marcin,

We are eargerly waiting, please post to this list when it is in CVS.

It is becoming a tiring task to collect "proposed" boost libraries
for usage when not in the main cvs.

ALSO:
1. What is the status on reading/writing environment variables?

2. Have you planned any support for writing command line arguments
as a string?

What I mean is that if a process wants to spawn another "written in-house"
process eg. something that uses boost.program_options to parse the command 
line
could they use the property_tree library to generate such command line as
an string?

Thanks
Shams

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcin Kalicinski" <kalita_at_[hidden]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: property tree library not in CVS?

> Hi Jeff,
>
>> As I've done in the past, I'll really encourage you *not* wait to finish 
>> the
>> docs to put the code in CVS.  To help us avoid a repeat of 1.34 we need
>> libraries going into 1.35 to be in CVS and regression tested as early in 
>> the
>> cycle as possible.  [...]
>
> I agree it might be beneficial to put the library in the CVS, even though 
> the docs are not up to date yet. But I don't yet have access to the main 
> CVS, so how should we handle that?
>
> Thank you,
> Marcin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>