Boost logo

Boost :

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-07 02:03:39

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> "Doug Gregor" <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>> On Oct 6, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Andy Little wrote:
>>>> "Stefan Seefeld" <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> <...>
>>>>> (and in fact I'm totally delighted to find the documentation use
>>>>> Concepts
>>>>> to present them !),
>>>> I wasnt going to bring it up, but I was specifically told not to
>>>> use Concept
>>>> docs.
>>> ?
>> para 5
> ? I don't see anything there that amounts to "specifically telling you
> not to use Concept docs."

Concepts arent an established convention. Read Doug Gregors post. They havent
been finalised. I knew exactly what you meant in that and other discussions.

Also I can say with a large amount of certainty that if I had presented PQS for
another review, and had used Concept documentation, then it would be pointed out
by you or others that I had been specifically told not to do so.

Now I shall sit back and watch the goalposts move as if by magic ...

Andy Little

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at