From: Johan Råde (rade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-12 09:40:03
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Johan Råde wrote:
>> Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>>> Are you interested in test results from a Tru64/Alpha machine?
>> Yes! I have not run any tests on Alphas.
> Here you are:
There are three problems:
1. The linking problem has been fixed in the latest version.
(Or did you have the latest version and just forgot to compile
2. A slightly different binary representation of long double than I had
expected. Is there any preprocessor symbol that I can use to detect
3. Your <limits> header is a bit funny.
numeric_limits<T>::quiet_NaN() returns a NaN with the signbit set.
This triggered the assertion.
(Does it matter? Maybe. According to C99, positive NaN should be
written to text files as "nan" or "+nan" and negative NaN as "-nan".
And this will probably be part of C++0x as well.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk