|
Boost : |
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-17 10:12:24
awk_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Is there any way (apart from modifying boost-base.jam) to change this
> behaviour, so that the dlls get different names for 32 and 64 bit, such as
> boost_date_time-vc80_x64-mt-1_33_1.dll for 64 bit?
Changing boost-base.jam is the only way :-(
But speaking of that... Should we add an architecture tag to the library
names? There was also a suggestion on the user list some time ago of
adding a user settable build tag so that users could tag individual
build+installs.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk