From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-19 21:37:57
On 10/19/2006 12:59 PM, Andy Little wrote:
> "Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>No problem. But have you seen Andy's work on matrices using fusion?
> As far as the work on "tuple" matrices is concerned, though originally conceived
> to enable use in my Quan types in transform matrices:
> The IMO more important use is to replace run time doubles with compile time
> "static" doubles usually for values of 1 or 0.
Andy, If all the types are the same(e.g. all double), then maybe a tuple
is too heavyweight. I'd think something like vector_c, maybe called
matrix_c, would be more appropriate. Or maybe you're wanting units with
that so that the elements would be a double, but a double with units
length/time or something else. Is that why tuples instead of matrix_c
is being used?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk