Re: [boost] 1.34 release: What about the inspection failures?

From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-20 06:38:30

John Maddock wrote:
[snip]
>> What should we do about the *LC* problems? Is it worth bothering with
>> those?
>
> Um, don't know, in theory yes, but there are a lot truly trivial
> issues showing up, for example there are dozens of html redirect
> files, that have
> no content except a http-refresh redirection, we could just mark
> these so they don't show up in the report I guess?

Sure, how can I mark them?
What about the People pages? Do they need license and copyright or 
should we just mark them too?

> I'm more concerned about all the broken links reported in the X
> report, some of our documentation looks to be in a very poor state :-(

Ok.

> If someone would like to look at this, and/or nag the authors
> concerned that would be great!

Aren't people automatically nagged about this anyway? If not I can 
surely do some personalized nagging :-).

Regards,

-- 
Andreas Huber
When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap
from the address shown in the header.