Re: [boost] 1.34 release: What about the inspection failures?

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-20 13:55:13

Hi,

Rene Rivera wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> Andreas Huber wrote:
>>> John Maddock wrote:
>> I guess 
>> in order of importance we need to fix:
>>
>> 1) Regressions.
>> 2) Coding guidelines violations (min/max/namespaces etc).
>> 3) Missing copyright on source files.
>> 4) Broken links in docs.
>> 5) Everything else :-)

Agreed.

> 
> Seems right.
> 
>> Oh and somewhere into all that, we need to decide whether users will be 
>> building 1.34 with bbv2 or bbv1.
> 
> Given that we haven't been doing regressions with BBv1 I think we've 
> already decided that we'll be building with BBv2. One area of help I 
> would appreciate on this one would be user level testing of the 
> build+install on the various platforms.

BBv2 is going to be the only supported build system for 1.34.0

> 
>> If the former then we need a new set of 
>> getting started instructions at a minimum.
> 
> Dave has been promising he is working on those. In case you want to nag 
> him directly ;-)

Consider this done. The nagging that is.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]