From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-24 18:52:08
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Problem counts:
> 1419 files missing Boost license info or having wrong reference text
It seems the majority of these license problems come from documentation
files, either html, or xml, css and xsl that genarate them.
I understand the need for copyright, but don't understand why these
files also need a license.
If we intend to do something about this problem, we are still a LONG
way from release. What are our release manager's feelings about this?
Can we get away with adding another filter to the analysis utility?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk