Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-31 12:09:50

On 10/29/06 3:23 PM, "Jason Hise" <0xchaos_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 10/29/06, Daryle Walker <darylew_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Couldn't there be better approximate fractions to use?
> I'm not sure if there were other questions implied by the ommited
> portions of your post, but my best guess is that you are looking for
> an algorithm which builds a good fit rational number from a float
> without resorting to a simple and inefficient decimal truncation. If
> this is what you are looking for then what might work is a function
> which builds a rational number as a continued fraction.
[TRUNCATE description of the building algorithm]

Actually, the question was rhetorical. I already found, using various web
calculators, better approximate fractions that could be used instead of the
"crude" 301/1000 or 30103/100000. I was suggesting that we could use one of
those "better" fractions instead.

Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at