From: Paul Giaccone (paulg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-01 04:26:46
> Bugs item #1588359, was opened at 2006-10-31 18:54
> Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
> You can respond by visiting:
> Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
> including the initial issue submission, for this request,
> not just the latest update.
> Category: None
> Group: None
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Priority: 5
> Private: No
> Submitted By: Alexis Wilke (alexis_wilke)
> Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> Summary: "Bug" in comment
> Initial Comment:
> This is very low priority!
> Hey guys,
> In this file:
> there is the following comment which says '9=unsigned
> long' and the code says '9=unsigned char'. Should
> someone get rid of that comment or fix it?
This is somewhat of a code smell. Better, IMO, to get rid of the
individual comments and to replace them with a single one, saying that
number "n" stands for type "T" in each line - this is then immune from
any transcription errors or changes to the code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk