Re: [boost] Boost Timer Update

From: Edward Lam (e4lam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-02 08:50:22

Philippe Vaucher wrote:
>    - portable: microsec_timer: documented as most robust timer, not the
>    best resolution one, good enough for 90% of the timings.
>    - portable: second_timer: this one is kindof obvious, no need to
>    describe much
>    - portable: clock_timer: timer based on std::clock, documentation
>    about clock() issue and resolutions

Interestingly, on MSVC 2003, clock() is implemented using 
GetSystemTimeAsFileTime(). This means that for Windows, microsec_timer is the 
same as clock_timer then. :)

-Edward