Re: [boost] grammar productions without virtual dispatch (was Re: [preprocessor] use case: named parameters for macros

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-02 22:01:29

On 10/25/2006 07:38 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
> On 10/25/2006 05:30 AM, Tobias Schwinger wrote:
[snip]
>  > replacement that uses typeof instead of virtual dispatch (see
[snip]
> The zip file:
> 
>    <boost-vault>/Template Metaprogramming/proto_static_disp.zip
> 
> uses g++ typeof, CRTP, and mpl::fold to do what sounds like something
> similar, i.e. eliminate the virtual dispatch.  IIRC, the CRTP was
In a private email to me, Tobias kindly pointed out that the method
in proto_static_disp has similarities with spirit's subrule
method for eliminating virtual dispatch.  I should have
researched spirit more thoroughly and noted this similarity
in my vault code and the post to this list.