From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-03 07:02:34
Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Anthony Williams wrote:
>> Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> And such a struct shall be aggregate?
> Don't understand:
> An aggregate is an array or class with no user-declared constructors, no
> private or protected non-static data members, no base classes, and no
> virtual functions.
> Our example class would fall out of this definition? Can't imagine why
> it should. To me the concept simply appears as an extension to
> aggregate initializers. Isn't it?
The class has a user-declared constructor, so it isn't an aggregate.
-- Anthony Williams Software Developer Just Software Solutions Ltd http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk