Re: [boost] [concept] Patch for Mutable_RandomAccessIterator

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-04 18:17:30

"K. Noel Belcourt" <kbelco_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Attached is a patch I had to make for CodeWarrior 10 on Darwin.  Not
> sure why self::iterator doesn't work.  Would someone please review
> and apply this patch to the head if it's acceptable.

I would prefer a patch that replaces the definition of self:

  #if BOOST_WORKAROUND( condition-for-CW10 )
      typedef Mutable_ReversibleContainer<C> self;
  #else
      typedef Mutable_RandomAccessContainer self;
  #endif

Could you please whip one up, test it, and submit it as a *unified*
diff?

Thanks,
Dave

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com