Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-04 19:25:43

Next message: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"
Previous message: Tom Brinkman: "[boost] Function Types Review Begins Monday, November 6, 2006"
In reply to: Eric Niebler: "[boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"
Next in thread: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"
Reply: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"

Eric Niebler wrote:
> I have a preprocessing task that exceeds my limited abilities.

<snip>

Disregard. I solved this problem by rolling my own version of mpl::and_
that takes the number of parameters I need. It does short-circuit
evaluation.

I'd still be curious what a PP solution looks like, though. The problem
stumped me for quite some time.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"
Previous message: Tom Brinkman: "[boost] Function Types Review Begins Monday, November 6, 2006"
In reply to: Eric Niebler: "[boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"
Next in thread: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"
Reply: Daniel Wallin: "Re: [boost] [proprocessor] PP challenge!"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk