From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-09 13:09:05
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> Hi all,
> What is the reason of this sudden increase in the number of failures
> for a lot of libraries? Has something underlying been broken? Was
> some platforms status changed from "broken" to "not broken", etc. Or
> is it just that a lot of new failures have been introduced?
Good question: my failure count has gone from a healthy zero up to 20.
Other people have faired a lot worse :-(
Most of the failures relate to something in MPL that's completely broken the
Borland results, if I could figure out what it was that changed, I would
suggest reverting it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk