From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 14:06:41
Johan Nilsson wrote:
> Paul Baxter wrote:
> FWIW, I agree.
> Keeping BBv1 in CVS and instead making BBv2 the default when executing
> "bjam" for this release would be easier on the users, in combination with
> adding support for "bjam --v1". Perhaps also some deprecation warnings
> should be output when building with v1.
> BBv1 could then be removed from Boost CVS in 1.35 and made available as a
> separate download (tgz, zip).
That are all valid points, but at the end of the day we just don't have
the resources. We can barely support one build system.
FWIW users that depend on v1 can always use 1.33.x
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk