From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 21:52:59
Johan Paulsson <boost.org_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I wanted to show, as briefly as possible, the basic usage of my
> implementation compared to something the readers of this mailing list
> would recognize. I think it does. It was not my intention to prove one
> implementation better than the other, or provide a very useful test, and
> I think I never implied that.
I do think you implied your implementation was better. You seem to be
concerned that you have offended somehow, but I have no problem with
that implication at all. Your arguments didn't hold up for me,
> Anyway, I am sorry you found it useless.
No need to apologize.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk