From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-10 23:29:05
Eric Niebler writes:
> Any chance one of the MPL gurus could have a look at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29653 and see if any
> possible changes to mpl/aux_/has_tag<> could make gcc happy?
This is basically another side of yet another GCC 4.1.x regression:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28088 (which is now
referenced from your bug report).
I'm pretty sure I could come up with a workaround if we really, really
want to see this work, but: it's already an intricate area in the
library, specifically under GCC and _because_ of its non-conforming
behavior that got broken in 4.1, so the cost of finding and
implementing a workaround that doesn't break things is going to be
pretty high. So, until somebody convinces me otherwise, I'd say this
is a good enough answer (from http://tinyurl.com/yccfau):
[ Caleb Epstein ] This is a regression in the gcc 4.1 series that
will be fixed in gcc 4.1.2. See bug #28088 for details.
> Preprocessed source code is attached to the bug report. FWIW, this
> is against Boost HEAD.
It surfaces in one of the basic MPL tests in RC_1_34_0 as well (see
the above link).
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk