Re: [boost] Exception lib proposal: renaming boost::exception_info

From: Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]
Date: 2006-11-13 02:11:18

> Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden] wrote:
> >> throw my_exception() <<
> >>     throw_info<tag_errno>(errno) <<
> >>     throw_info<tag_function>(BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION);
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >
> >> Any strong preferences?
> >
> > What about upcoming boost::system::error_code and 
> > boost::system::system_error (used to report os errors)?

> If I read you correctly, what you're saying is that if 
> boost::exception is accepted, we need to think about 
> integration with the rest of boost. For example, if 
> boost::system::system_error derives from std::runtime_error 
> (as it does now) and also from boost::exception, (someone 
> correct me if I'm missing something) the definition of 
> boost::system_error could be reduced
> to:

I would not introduce boost::exception stuff into boost::system.
 
> throw enable_exception_info(system_error(....));

Maybe a better solution?!

Oliver