From: Hans Meine (meine_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-14 09:59:27
On Tuesday, 14. November 2006 03:01, Lubomir Bourdev wrote:
> I should add to my earlier reply that I have no objection to having the
> above transformation per se.
> You are free to define it if you think it is useful.
> You can call it copy_and_cast_pixels, for example.
Indeed, that would be a good name, which makes the semantics clear.
Ciao, / /
/ / ANS
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk