From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-14 13:46:50
"Emil Dotchevski" <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> The first example uses "error_info_value" without qualification. You
>> need to test your examples.
> In the examples in the documentation, only "exception" is qualified,
> to differentiate between boost::exception and std::exception. The
> examples are easier to read and understand without boost:: sprinkled
> all over.
In my opinion they're not. I think the idea that leaving out
qualification clarifies code is a common misconception.
> As for testing, I tried to compile the first example, the compiler
> choked on the "...." and I gave up. :)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk