From: Paul Giaccone (paulg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-20 04:46:31
My interpretation is that the email sig is probably tacked on to
anything that the author writes whether or not it is actually
proprietary, and means that that the _text of the email_ is (or might
be) proprietary. The library itself was not included in the email, so
that isn't what is referred to. If it was, then this thread shows that
this needed to be stated more explicitly.
In any case, I'm curious to know what this library does that Spirit
doesn't already. Isn't this just a specialised parser?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk