From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-22 00:18:54
On 11/19/06 4:53 AM, "AlisdairM" <alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> This is another patch for a test case, as it is the test case that
> exploits the Borland bug.
> Essentially, BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT cannot be used inside a member
> template on this compiler, so we need to fall back on using an enum in
> those cases.
Isn't BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT supposed to switch to an enum-based solution in
those cases? Maybe the fix is to change the #defines that determine which
implementation BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT uses. Unless the problem is that the
non-enum solution works in the same kinds of blocks that are not member
> Updating the test case with this workaround shows that Borland can use
> the tested library correctly, so I would like to apply the patch to
> both mainline and rc_1_34_0 branch.
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk