Re: [boost] Yet another bignum type

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-26 17:10:37

On 11/25/06 8:51 AM, "Mathias Gaunard" <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Daryle Walker wrote:
>> This is something I've been working on for the past few months.
> 
> Why not wrap a known and robust library instead of making a new one?

1.  AFAIK, all those known & robust libraries already have wrappers
2.  This type is more of a theoretical class than something that can compete
against the "big boys".  Having an adjustable radix alone is an indication
of that.
3.  I always thought that this idea was neat, and always wanted to make such
a class ever since I heard of C++, even though I'm definitely not the first.

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com