From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-26 17:10:37
On 11/25/06 8:51 AM, "Mathias Gaunard" <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]>
> Daryle Walker wrote:
>> This is something I've been working on for the past few months.
> Why not wrap a known and robust library instead of making a new one?
1. AFAIK, all those known & robust libraries already have wrappers
2. This type is more of a theoretical class than something that can compete
against the "big boys". Having an adjustable radix alone is an indication
3. I always thought that this idea was neat, and always wanted to make such
a class ever since I heard of C++, even though I'm definitely not the first.
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk