From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-28 00:49:15
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Pardon my nit-picking, but I fail to see the relation between
> BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB spelling and autolinking -- which is exactly what
> macro controls.
> Perhaps this macro has some extra semantics, but I can't find any,
> for auto-linking, in separate_compilation.html, nor in library's
> config.hpp files.
> Wouldn't it be better if the macro was named BOOST_ALL_NO_AUTOLINK?
Ummm, with mumbled apologies, yes it would.
But, it's not only that one, all the auto-link macros would benefit from a
bit of creative (and consistent) renaming at some point.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk