From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-01 20:12:34
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Howard Hinnant
> > I wouldn't really need the extra indirection that seems to
> be implied
> > there but that's a step in the right direction.
> <nod> Agreed. The indirection is in there really only because you
> said "C". The deleter type can easily be a C++ class type which can
> then do anything you want.
Yes, it turns out I read your code wrong. I was thinking that was the
signature for a something that would construct a tr1::function
Been so long since I mucked around with function pointers :) Thankfully.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk