Re: [boost] FW: Suggestion for boost`s smart pointers

From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-01 20:12:34

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Howard Hinnant

> > I wouldn't really need the extra indirection that seems to 
> be implied
> > there but that's a step in the right direction.
> 
> <nod> Agreed.  The indirection is in there really only because you  
> said "C".  The deleter type can easily be a C++ class type which can  
> then do anything you want.

Yes, it turns out I read your code wrong. I was thinking that was the
signature for a something that would construct a tr1::function
eventually.

Been so long since I mucked around with function pointers :) Thankfully.