Re: [boost] [math/common_factor] bunch o' fixes

From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-04 02:09:26

"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" ha escrito:

> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]>
> Fecha: Viernes, Diciembre 1, 2006 5:35 pm
> Asunto: Re: [boost] [math/common_factor] bunch o' fixes
> Para: boost_at_[hidden]
>
> > Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> > > Ouch! I wasn't aware John already attacked this one. I've looked up
> > > his post, compared the patches and, IMHO, looks like mine is
> > slightly> more preferable because it does not disable the UDT
> > tests for broken
> > > compilers.
> >
> > In that case, I'm happy to go with yours :-)
> >
> > > Anyway, what we need is that either patch is applied so that we
> > begin> clearing down the few remaining regressions between us and
> > 1.34.0 beta1.
> >
> > Ain't that the truth!
> >
> > John.
>
> What is Daryle's opinion on this? He's been around the list
> as of lately.

Having received no objection, I've just commited the patch to HEAD
and RC_1_34_0.

Best,

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo