From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-04 06:27:18
John Maddock wrote:
> Martin Wille wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> the intel-linux-9.0 failure:
>>> looks like segfault or something like that -- no errors messages, and
>>> non-zero return status. Can you run the test manually and
>>> tell what's going on?
> I can reproduce this with just
> #include <cmath>
> int main()
> long double d = std::tan(-0.53682426991417537756471137222469281L);
> return d;
> So I'll file a bug report with Intel.
Thanks! As soon as Intel confirms this is their bug, or if you sufficiently
sure it is, can you please update status/expected_failures.xml?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk